‎

The Sixth Committee (GA6) is where the UN’s legal backbone takes shape. Instead of military maneuvers or rapid-fire crisis updates, this committee dives into the legal frameworks that define how states interact, how international crimes are prosecuted, and how global norms evolve. Debate here is precise, technical, and rooted in legal reasoning — but still highly political, as states often hide their strategic interests behind legal arguments.

GA6 pushes delegates to think like diplomats and jurists: every speech must be grounded in international law, every clause must be defensible, and every stance must balance national interest with global principles.

Agenda Topics

Topic A: TBA

Topic B: TBA

Committee Dynamics & Expectations

GA6 demands a different kind of intensity. Delegates must be ready to analyze past conventions, reference legal precedents, and navigate the fine line between what is legal, what is legitimate, and what is politically possible. Expect slower, more structured debates — but with underlying tensions as states push for language that subtly shifts legal standards in their favor.

You’ll be expected to:

• Present well-researched legal arguments rather than broad political rhetoric.
• Negotiate language carefully — a single word can change the scope of an entire resolution.
• Build coalitions based on shared legal principles, regional groupings, and long-term institutional interests.
• Balance respect for existing international law with the need to modernize or reinterpret it.

Unlike crisis committees, GA6 doesn’t revolve around urgency. Instead, its pressure comes from precision, credibility, and the ability to defend your position under scrutiny.

Key Features of Legal:

1. Legal Framing as Strategy:
   Delegates must root their proposals in conventions, treaties, and customary international law. Strong legal grounding boosts credibility and influence.
2. Intense Clause-Level Negotiations:
   Drafting sessions are detail-heavy. Lines, definitions, and legal terms will be debated and reworked repeatedly.
3. Non-Binding, But Norm-Shaping Resolutions:
   GA6 resolutions are not legally binding — but they often guide future treaties, influence state behavior, and shape global expectations. Delegates who master persuasive legal reasoning can leave a lasting impact.
4. Political Interests Hidden in Legal Language:
   States may frame political agendas as “legal concerns,” so expect subtle power plays beneath the formal tone.
5. Collaboration with Expert Bodies:
   Debate often invokes the International Law Commission, ICJ jurisprudence, and UN legal precedents. Delegates should be ready to reference and interpret these sources confidently.